Culturing Science – biology as relevant to us earthly beings

Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction

Illustration by Angus McKie

Republished on Geekosystem and io9!  Thanks!

I write this post going into science fiction as a fan, but also unaware of how most scientists think about it.  I can imagine two central viewpoints: (1) scientists who enjoy it (like myself), simultaneously as entertainment and a bit of critical thinking and (2) scientists who dislike it due to its tendency to portray “evil scientists” and/or science and technology gone awry, destroying the world.

I didn’t really grow up reading science fiction.  Sure, I was (and am) completely obsessed with some fantasy novels (e.g. Lord of the Rings) but never made the leap to becoming a true sci-fi nerd.  It wasn’t until I started studying science more fully that I developed an interest in speculative science fiction.  Many of the stories do deal with technology taking over civilization – but embedded within this framework is a great deal of excitement, along with some deserved anxiety.

The best way for me to explain these conflicting emotions is with an example of something that happened to me in the past few weeks.  We are slowly inching closer to developing lab-produced organs, which would be incredibly beneficial for a lot of obvious reasons.  Just this month there have been developments toward mass-produced red blood cells, as well as bioartificial lungs.  Eerily, I read about these discoveries as I was tearing my way through Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, a speculative fiction novel about a bio-engineered future, including “pigoons” (pig/balloon) that have grown to massive sizes in order to grow 6 kidneys at a time for organ harvest, and “ChickieNobs,” a fast food product made from transgenic chickens that have no brains or beaks and grow 8 chicken breasts at once.  While reading, I simultaneously was in wonderment about how we could be reaching the ability to actually engineer these creatures, but obviously nervous about the implications described in the novel.  (No spoilers here!)

Some scientists might write this kind of anxious thinking off as trash.  “We’re trying to develop organs to save lives – we don’t need a bunch of crazies trying to stop us in order to avoid a hypothetical bioengineering apocalypse!”  But scientists are born and raised to be skeptical – and that’s all that much of this writing is.  Being skeptical about the pure goodness of scientific advance.

But more importantly, science fiction is one of the ways that non-scientists absorb science.  Oryx and Crake is a national bestseller, suggesting that millions of people have read her tale of bioengineering gone wrong.  While we should assume that the public knows that this is in fact fiction and doesn’t take it entirely seriously, these stories do raise questions about the potential misuses of science that might not be as prevalent otherwise.  I believe that scientists have a duty to communicate with the public (and not all agree with me on this).  By knowing where non-scientists are coming from, scientists can better address some of the potential issues that might be raised by their achievements.

EC Comic's "Weird Science" #6 (1951)

Sci-fi also provides a venue for discerning how our ways of thinking about science have developed historically.  One of my favorite time periods for sci-fi is the 1950s: it was a time when just enough was known to speculate wildly, but not enough to fully disregard these speculations.  After all, Watson and Crick did not discover the DNA structure until 1953!   Thus you have the birth of many of our superheroes, variously mutated by “cosmic rays” or radiation, altering their molecular structures and giving them superpowers.  We had just enough pieces to wonder, but not enough to know the full picture.

And sometimes the stories told ended up being truths nowadays.  Reading stories that feature scientific dreams of these writers, and now knowing that they’ve come true, can be heart-wrenching.  In one of my favorite short stories, “The End of the Beginning” in R is for Rocket, Ray Bradbury describes a couple gripping their seats with excitement and nervousness as their son boards a shuttle – the first shuttle to land on the moon.  This collection was written in 1965, 4 years before Apollo 11 landed on the moon.  Bradbury’s description is incredible:

All I know is it’s really the end of the beginning.  The Stone Age, Bronze Age, Iron Age; from now on we’ll lump all those together under one big name for when we walked on Earth… Millions of years we fought gravity.  When we were amoebas and fish we struggled to get out of the sea without gravity crushing us.  Once safe on the shore we fought to stand upright without gravity breaking our new invention, the spine, tried to walk without stumbling, run without falling.  A billion years Gravity kept us home… That’s what’s so really big about tonight … it’s the end of old man Gravity and the age we’ll remember him by, once and for all.

Gives you shivers, eh?  Of course, this day has come and gone in real time.  We are still constrained by gravity, we haven’t set foot on a planet beyond the moon.  But these science fiction stories can bring us back to that time of wonderment, help us to experience a feeling we missed: the great excitement of space potentially conquered.  And although it didn’t happen quite the way Bradbury described it, we can pretend for at least a little while.

Science is about that excitement.  About that drive to discovery, about idealism and hope.  It’s easy to forget that, working away at my lab bench, pipetting DNA into tubes.  Now we know a little more about science – enough that we no longer dream of mutated superheroes.  But we still dream about the day when we’ll make our big discovery, solve our own scientific problem.

Science fiction can remind us of this wonderment and hope.  But it also sends us a warning – to think about the potential implications of our findings, beyond our idealistic dreams.  While those implications might not be as exciting as a science fiction novel, they exist, and scientists should be aware of them.

With that, I’ll leave you this quote from David Brin from Nature‘s series of interviews with science writers this past winter.

Science fiction is badly named — it should have been called speculative history… Whether you are in a parallel reality or exploring the future, it is all about the implications of change on human lives. The fundamental premise of sci-fi is not spaceships and lasers — it’s that children can learn from the mistakes of their parents.

From "Weird Science" #6 (1951)

Written by Hanner

July 20, 2010 at 11:34 am

18 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. [...] Friend-of-the-blog Hannah Waters, on Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction. This article’s blowin’ up! Explore posts in the same categories: [...]

  2. Indeed! More about both sides of this coin:

    The Double Helix: Why Science Needs Science Fiction
    http://www.starshipreckless.com/stories/

    SF Goes McDonald’s: Less Taste, More Gristle
    http://crossedgenres.com/simf/2010/03/08/sf-goes-mcdonalds-less-taste-more-gristle/

    I did my PhD on yeast also (my lab was next door to Lenny Guarente’s at MIT), though as an independent PI I’ve focused on molecular neurobiology of the human brain (alternative splicing and its link to dementia).

    Good luck with your research.

    Athena Andreadis

    July 23, 2010 at 9:42 am

    • Thanks for the links! Will definitely have to check them out.

      I’m writing back this quickly because… YOU WORKED WITH LENNY GUARENTE?! Both my bosses worked with him: One I believe was a grad student there, and the other was a post-doc. Crazy!!

      Good luck in your work as well!

      Hannah

      July 23, 2010 at 9:46 am

  3. Not with him — one of my classmates did. I was in Paul Schimmel’s lab next door. Lenny was a young skinny high strung assistant professor then. Though he still talks too fast!

    The first link will take you to an essay that I wrote when people asked me why I wrote a popular science book before I got tenure (To Seek Out New Life: The Biology of Star Trek, published by a subsidiary of Random House). The Double Helix was my reply; the essay went on to win a National Award.

    Athena Andreadis

    July 23, 2010 at 9:53 am

  4. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  5. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  6. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  7. You make great points about science fiction being able to capture the two sides of scientific progress: the excitement of new discoveries and the potential dangers those discoveries might lead to. And I think that’s why many scientists do indeed enjoy reading (and watching) SF.

    Way back in 2008, I asked a bunch of scientists what they thought about science fiction in preparation for ScienceOnline09. If you’re interested in what other scientists have had to say, I’ve linked the posts to my name.

    (And I promise I’m not following you around the internet Athena!)

    Peggy

    October 7, 2010 at 12:20 am

  8. [...] wywiad z Peterem F. Hamiltonem, z Charlsem Strossem oraz z Pat Cadigan. Można też przekonać się dlaczego literatura SF powinna być istotną dla naukowców, przeczytać o wizerunku wampirów, a także [...]

  9. Why those who may be the next generation of scientists should
    (and why we should encourage them to) read science fiction
    is because it can turn them on to science fact. They may come for
    the fiction and stay for the science. There is some evidence for this
    such as here with SF Builds Scientists – Official!.

    Concatenation

    October 16, 2010 at 5:15 am

  10. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  11. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  12. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  13. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  14. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  15. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  16. [...] tricks on the internet and our search for non-human ‘intelligence’ Culturing Science: Why Scientists Should Read Science Fiction Culturing Science: Microbe biogeography: the distribution, dispersal and evolution of the littlest [...]

  17. [...] with meagre edits from a previous iteration of Culturing Science on Jul 20, 2010. A good blog post about novella moving scholarship by Uta [...]


Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53 other followers

%d bloggers like this: